There is no shortage of discussion to be found on the sad events of this past Saturday. I feel no obligation to contribute to the discourse, but I do want to provide a few thoughts.
Before I begin, I want to humbly express my own deep sadness and concern over the events of the weekend. What happened was nothing short of a tragedy and nothing I say changes that fact.
The thought that this event would quell the shrill voices which perpetuate the left versus right spectacle has sadly, but not surprisingly, proved to be a dream. Many of those who have attempted to use this opportunity to ask for reflective thought have quickly turned such a plea to a bully pulpit to advance their own, not-so-veiled, rhetoric. This is not shocking. This is the world we live in. And this tragedy does not appear to be the unifying event which will galvanize the masses for good.
Now, I did not watch President Obama's speech tonight (I have the CSPAN replay running right now), but I heard via Twitter that it was very good and delivered the "right" tone. That is encouraging, but I expect it to last about 15 seconds. In fact, in channel surfing to MSNBC (note that I very rarely watch FOX News), the focus has not shifted very much from the "blame Sarah Palin" and "take away the guns" message.
There are a few other things that I think we need to put into perspective. While it is despicable that any human being is targeted for an assassination attempt, we must remember that murder and other heinous crimes happen everyday to "normal" human beings. I believe that all life is precious. I believe that all men are created equal. Six people were killed on Saturday and more than a dozen more were injured in the shooting. There is so much focus on this tragedy because of the involvement of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. There have been six homicides in Indianapolis so far this year, yet we hear very little about these individuals.
The very fact that we focus on the celebrity of our elected officials has an integrated effect on the heated partisan rivalry. It's a viscous cycle which is continually reinforced. The stakes will get higher and higher until they collapse due to the false weight that is placed upon the perceived importance of our elected officials and the propaganda that drives our political conversation. If we want to depart from the nasty politics that so many complain about, we must reject the power that we've allowed the state to absorb and the status that we've anointed to our politicians.
There is a whole other conversation to be had on Jared Loughner. I don't want to dwell on him for a variety of reasons. We should be careful, though, in using the broad strokes of "crazy", "mentally ill", "disturbed" and the like. Loughner, it appears to me, was quite calculated in this act. He no doubt had issues with society. His acts on Saturday are inexcusable and justice awaits him. However, those who question authority and do not fit in nicely with the stereotype of humanity should not be written off as ill.
We should not use the fact that this young man was concerned about the direction of our society and had an inability to express such concerns in a socially normal manner to, in any way, excuse, justify, or explain his actions.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Friday, January 7, 2011
And Now It's Time for a Breakdown
Cue En Vouge:
All references to 90's R&B groups aside, let's take a serious look at this. We are about ready to have a showdown on the debt ceiling. As of yesterday, January 6, 2010, the federal debt subject to the debt ceiling was just shy of $14T. The current ceiling is $14.294T and we will reach that figure sometime between March and May this year. The date cannot be exactly determined because day-to-day receipts and expenditures are not fixed - just like your own budget. (See this entry from 2009 to get a little more detail on short-term Treasury securities.) But, the showdown is coming; there is no doubt about that.
Now, many fiscal conservatives want to see material cuts in the budget. I'd also venture to guess your average Tea Party Republican is squarely opposed to raising the debt ceiling. These GOP supporters are going to be very disappointed when their House leadership (not to mention, and I'm guessing here, all but a handful of GOP Senators) votes to raise the debt ceiling. It is inevitable and what we'll hear is a bunch of lip service that they've made some sort of grand compromise to get us on the right track.
But, let's face it. All it will be is lip service. Let's take a look at the budget and a realistic scenario of what we might expect the GOP to offer as well as a theoretical balanced budget provided by yours truly.
To start, we take a look at a summary of the budget. We all know that budget deficits have exploded beginning in fiscal year 2009. It should be noted that this is a George W. Bush budget and not an Obama budget.
Next, we look at the growth of the total public debt and that which is subject to the debt ceiling. It is clear that we will reach the current ceiling soon. On a basic trendline forecast, it will happen in March.
So, what actually makes up the federal budget from an expenditure point of view? The next table details the key categories and shows the actual figures from 2004 (fiscal year) through the current projection for 2013 based on Obama's 2011 budget. You can see the details of the explosive growth and also note the key expense categories: Social Security, Defense, Medicare, Interest on Debt, and Medicaid. Those five categories typically make up two-thirds of the federal budget.
Source: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy11/index.html
What is the GOP likely to offer? As I said earlier, 2011 is going to be a lost cause. Looking at 2012, I've laid out a generous GOP budget offer as well as my own budget proposal. For the Republican budget, I've made the following assumptions (which I think are a best case scenario):
This scenario would lead to a $3.5T budget. If there are no changes in total federal revenues (i.e. no tax increases or significant growth in GDP), this would still leave a budget deficit of over $500B. In fact, it would only reduce the deficit by 29% which means the debt ceiling would need to be raised by over one trillion dollars from its existing level to get us to October 30, 2012 (right before the elections).
Think about that. Even if the GOP brings its "A" game, I think it's hard to imagine a scenario where they do not have to vote to raise the debt ceiling by over (I'll say it again) one trillion dollars even before we reach the lame duck session of 2012.
Hey Tea Party folks... I think it's time you take a look at the Libertarian Party.
For those of you who are not Tea Partiers... please recognize the current path is unsustainable. We need to dramatically cut the size and scope of the federal government. You should also be looking at the LP!
Never gonna get it,That is my message to all of you out there who supported the Republicans this last election and thought they would make a material change to reduce the federal deficit. You're never gonna get it!
Never gonna get it,
Never gonna get it,
Never gonna get it,
Never gonna get it,
Never gonna get it,
Never gonna get it,
Woo, woo, woo, woo!
All references to 90's R&B groups aside, let's take a serious look at this. We are about ready to have a showdown on the debt ceiling. As of yesterday, January 6, 2010, the federal debt subject to the debt ceiling was just shy of $14T. The current ceiling is $14.294T and we will reach that figure sometime between March and May this year. The date cannot be exactly determined because day-to-day receipts and expenditures are not fixed - just like your own budget. (See this entry from 2009 to get a little more detail on short-term Treasury securities.) But, the showdown is coming; there is no doubt about that.
Now, many fiscal conservatives want to see material cuts in the budget. I'd also venture to guess your average Tea Party Republican is squarely opposed to raising the debt ceiling. These GOP supporters are going to be very disappointed when their House leadership (not to mention, and I'm guessing here, all but a handful of GOP Senators) votes to raise the debt ceiling. It is inevitable and what we'll hear is a bunch of lip service that they've made some sort of grand compromise to get us on the right track.
But, let's face it. All it will be is lip service. Let's take a look at the budget and a realistic scenario of what we might expect the GOP to offer as well as a theoretical balanced budget provided by yours truly.
To start, we take a look at a summary of the budget. We all know that budget deficits have exploded beginning in fiscal year 2009. It should be noted that this is a George W. Bush budget and not an Obama budget.
Next, we look at the growth of the total public debt and that which is subject to the debt ceiling. It is clear that we will reach the current ceiling soon. On a basic trendline forecast, it will happen in March.
So, what actually makes up the federal budget from an expenditure point of view? The next table details the key categories and shows the actual figures from 2004 (fiscal year) through the current projection for 2013 based on Obama's 2011 budget. You can see the details of the explosive growth and also note the key expense categories: Social Security, Defense, Medicare, Interest on Debt, and Medicaid. Those five categories typically make up two-thirds of the federal budget.
What is the GOP likely to offer? As I said earlier, 2011 is going to be a lost cause. Looking at 2012, I've laid out a generous GOP budget offer as well as my own budget proposal. For the Republican budget, I've made the following assumptions (which I think are a best case scenario):
- Social Security and Medicare spending stay flat at 2011 levels (4% and 2% respective decreases versus current estimate)
- 10% decrease versus proposed 2012 spending levels for Medicaid, Food/Nutrition, and other mandatory spending
- No change in spending versus proposed 2012 levels for Defense, Interest payments, Veteran's Benefits and Federal Employee Pensions and Disability payments
- A return to 2008 spending levels for Unemployment Benefits and non-Defense Discretionary spending (45% and 16% decreases versus proposed 2012)
This scenario would lead to a $3.5T budget. If there are no changes in total federal revenues (i.e. no tax increases or significant growth in GDP), this would still leave a budget deficit of over $500B. In fact, it would only reduce the deficit by 29% which means the debt ceiling would need to be raised by over one trillion dollars from its existing level to get us to October 30, 2012 (right before the elections).
Think about that. Even if the GOP brings its "A" game, I think it's hard to imagine a scenario where they do not have to vote to raise the debt ceiling by over (I'll say it again) one trillion dollars even before we reach the lame duck session of 2012.
Hey Tea Party folks... I think it's time you take a look at the Libertarian Party.
For those of you who are not Tea Partiers... please recognize the current path is unsustainable. We need to dramatically cut the size and scope of the federal government. You should also be looking at the LP!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)